<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Election 2008</title>
	<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on CLINTON WINS PA by Common Sense12</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-854</guid>
		<description>TROUBLED WATERS AHEAD. OBAMA COULD LOSE. WE NEED HILLARY CLINTON ON THE TEAM.
 
As of today, there are troubled waters ahead for the probable Democratic Party Nominee for President. Obama could lose. BUT, the addition of Hillary Clinton could make a difference. Please read on.
 
 
From www.realclearpolitics.com for July 2nd, they are showing for a November General Election for "Gallup Tracking" nationwide only a plus 5% margin for Obama over McCain.
 

Continuing, please read an article written by Harry Siegel posted on Politico.com dated June 19th titled: "Obama Could Win Vote, and Lose Election".


Then let me add Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post, with his brilliant article dated June 27th titled: "The Ever-Malleable Mr. Obama".
 
 
Then go to one more, "The Two Obamas" by David Brooks in the New York Times for June 20th, 2008.
 

We have now exposed what many of us knew for a long time, Mr. Obama is an absolute "flip-flopper", and thinks we don't see it. And this is a person who when he was a State Legislator in Illinois, voted "Present" 130 times only to avoid taking a position. And now he wants to be our President.

 
That being said, let's move ahead now with Mr. Obama out front as the Presidential nominee, and "orator-in-chief". No problem.
 

However, I believe if Hillary Clinton were invited to be on the ticket as the Vice Presidential candidate, and offered to head up some new important task force in a new administration, I am sure our chances of electing a Democratic Party President in November would be greatly improved, and I believe there are 18 Million other voters who also agree. These are the 18 million voters out here who just recently stood with Hillary Clinton in this primary contest we just concluded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TROUBLED WATERS AHEAD. OBAMA COULD LOSE. WE NEED HILLARY CLINTON ON THE TEAM.</p>
<p>As of today, there are troubled waters ahead for the probable Democratic Party Nominee for President. Obama could lose. BUT, the addition of Hillary Clinton could make a difference. Please read on.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com</a> for July 2nd, they are showing for a November General Election for &#8220;Gallup Tracking&#8221; nationwide only a plus 5% margin for Obama over McCain.</p>
<p>Continuing, please read an article written by Harry Siegel posted on Politico.com dated June 19th titled: &#8220;Obama Could Win Vote, and Lose Election&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then let me add Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post, with his brilliant article dated June 27th titled: &#8220;The Ever-Malleable Mr. Obama&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then go to one more, &#8220;The Two Obamas&#8221; by David Brooks in the New York Times for June 20th, 2008.</p>
<p>We have now exposed what many of us knew for a long time, Mr. Obama is an absolute &#8220;flip-flopper&#8221;, and thinks we don&#8217;t see it. And this is a person who when he was a State Legislator in Illinois, voted &#8220;Present&#8221; 130 times only to avoid taking a position. And now he wants to be our President.</p>
<p>That being said, let&#8217;s move ahead now with Mr. Obama out front as the Presidential nominee, and &#8220;orator-in-chief&#8221;. No problem.</p>
<p>However, I believe if Hillary Clinton were invited to be on the ticket as the Vice Presidential candidate, and offered to head up some new important task force in a new administration, I am sure our chances of electing a Democratic Party President in November would be greatly improved, and I believe there are 18 Million other voters who also agree. These are the 18 million voters out here who just recently stood with Hillary Clinton in this primary contest we just concluded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Live Post: Results Are In! by Election 2008 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analyzing the results from Penn</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/results-are-in/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Election 2008 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analyzing the results from Penn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/results-are-in/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>[...] total, from the polling stations around Penn&#8217;s campus, Obama won 71.5% of the vote. Dark blue indicates Clinton won less than 29% of the vote, light blue indicates she won more than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] total, from the polling stations around Penn&#8217;s campus, Obama won 71.5% of the vote. Dark blue indicates Clinton won less than 29% of the vote, light blue indicates she won more than [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLINTON WINS PA by Common Sense 12</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense 12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>WOW. Is all the above anger necessary? I really don't know what it accomplishes, other than lets that one person blow off some steam, and maybe it makes them feel better afterwards. But we'll be sure not to count on their vote. No problem.

Meanwhile Hillary Clinton should continue, and will do so.  Nine states are left to vote. And several million voters in Florida and Michigan who voted for Hillary Clinton must be counted. Mr. Obama is obecting to a revote in those two states, because he knows he will lose. So that will have to be decided at the Denver Convention.

As to those people above and any others who similar join in with heavy venting, no problem. We'll just pass the word, you will not be voting for Senator Clinton, so we won't count on your vote.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. Is all the above anger necessary? I really don&#8217;t know what it accomplishes, other than lets that one person blow off some steam, and maybe it makes them feel better afterwards. But we&#8217;ll be sure not to count on their vote. No problem.</p>
<p>Meanwhile Hillary Clinton should continue, and will do so.  Nine states are left to vote. And several million voters in Florida and Michigan who voted for Hillary Clinton must be counted. Mr. Obama is obecting to a revote in those two states, because he knows he will lose. So that will have to be decided at the Denver Convention.</p>
<p>As to those people above and any others who similar join in with heavy venting, no problem. We&#8217;ll just pass the word, you will not be voting for Senator Clinton, so we won&#8217;t count on your vote.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLINTON WINS PA by Sophomore</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophomore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I am all for replacing the "C" word with "the ruthless, scheming, power hungry, lying, and treacherous Hillary Clinton". Although the "C" word is shorter, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for replacing the &#8220;C&#8221; word with &#8220;the ruthless, scheming, power hungry, lying, and treacherous Hillary Clinton&#8221;. Although the &#8220;C&#8221; word is shorter, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLINTON WINS PA by again with the editors......</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>again with the editors......</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>.....lines should be drawn when it comes to the "C" word.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..lines should be drawn when it comes to the &#8220;C&#8221; word&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLINTON WINS PA by Sorry</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>No she can't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No she can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLINTON WINS PA by Alumna</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Alumna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Shame on Hillary Clinton for staying in a race that she has already lost. She is showing no concern for the democratic party and jeopardizing a possible win in the presidential election. And for what? For her lust for power. It's a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame on Hillary Clinton for staying in a race that she has already lost. She is showing no concern for the democratic party and jeopardizing a possible win in the presidential election. And for what? For her lust for power. It&#8217;s a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLINTON WINS PA by Sigh</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Anyone who supports this dishonest and scheming candidate must have screw loose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who supports this dishonest and scheming candidate must have screw loose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLINTON WINS PA by Well Done Hillary..!!</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Well Done Hillary..!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>I'm so happy for her and the entire country..!!! She Can Do It..!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so happy for her and the entire country..!!! She Can Do It..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLINTON WINS PA by Nomoreclinton</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomoreclinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/election2008/2008/04/22/clinton-wins-pa/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>I must puke when I see is this cunt on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must puke when I see is this cunt on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
