<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buzz redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: another buzz fan</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>another buzz fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/?p=601#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Not sure what the hubbub is about, what's so bad about this version? Different colors, whoppe freakin doo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what the hubbub is about, what&#8217;s so bad about this version? Different colors, whoppe freakin doo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzz fan</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>buzz fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/?p=601#comment-643</guid>
		<description>What, exactly, was wrong with the old version? Was it too easy to use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, exactly, was wrong with the old version? Was it too easy to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lei</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/?p=601#comment-642</guid>
		<description>The "comment awaiting moderation" message was a misconfiguration. We apologize for the confusion.

-David Lei, Web Editor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;comment awaiting moderation&#8221; message was a misconfiguration. We apologize for the confusion.</p>
<p>-David Lei, Web Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Scurria</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Scurria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/?p=601#comment-641</guid>
		<description>No, I don't anticipate us using cuts (where you have to click to see the rest of the post) very often. I do think we will use them for our in-game updates, though, since those posts tend to be quite long and take up a lot of room on the page.

As for the comments section, I agree that the old drop-down format of the comments was better, but to be honest with you, I have way too little computer knowledge to comment intelligently on why the new version is the way it is.

I'm also not sure exactly what the "comment awaiting moderation" message was all about. I will ask our Web Editor about that and post a response. One small correction -- we do get spam sometimes. That was a big problem a few months ago but we seem to have gotten rid of most of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t anticipate us using cuts (where you have to click to see the rest of the post) very often. I do think we will use them for our in-game updates, though, since those posts tend to be quite long and take up a lot of room on the page.</p>
<p>As for the comments section, I agree that the old drop-down format of the comments was better, but to be honest with you, I have way too little computer knowledge to comment intelligently on why the new version is the way it is.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not sure exactly what the &#8220;comment awaiting moderation&#8221; message was all about. I will ask our Web Editor about that and post a response. One small correction &#8212; we do get spam sometimes. That was a big problem a few months ago but we seem to have gotten rid of most of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugh</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/?p=601#comment-640</guid>
		<description>So... you went ahead and replaced the previous elegant simplicity with a cluttered, unnecessary redesign. So now I suppose I'll have to click on each post to read the full text of it, go to a seperate page for comments, etc. Yeah, that sounds great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; you went ahead and replaced the previous elegant simplicity with a cluttered, unnecessary redesign. So now I suppose I&#8217;ll have to click on each post to read the full text of it, go to a seperate page for comments, etc. Yeah, that sounds great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Blog</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>New Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/?p=601#comment-639</guid>
		<description>Ok, I take it back, the comment section looks awful.  "Your comment is awaiting moderation"?  What's that about? Sick of being criticized? DP censoring the blogs great!  I hadn't noticed any spam or obscenities on the comments so I'm not sure this is necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I take it back, the comment section looks awful.  &#8220;Your comment is awaiting moderation&#8221;?  What&#8217;s that about? Sick of being criticized? DP censoring the blogs great!  I hadn&#8217;t noticed any spam or obscenities on the comments so I&#8217;m not sure this is necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Blog</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>New Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/?p=601#comment-638</guid>
		<description>I'm not a huge fan but as long as you keep the entire post on the main page and don't require people to click a link to see the post in its entirety I can deal with it.  Also, the comment section looks like it'll be less fun than the last one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a huge fan but as long as you keep the entire post on the main page and don&#8217;t require people to click a link to see the post in its entirety I can deal with it.  Also, the comment section looks like it&#8217;ll be less fun than the last one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disappointed</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/2007/11/02/buzz-redesign/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>disappointed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thebuzz/?p=601#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Nice job to the buzz for continuing the dp tradition of making web content uglier and more difficult to navigate. The old site was far easier to use, find posts and post comments. You guys sure know to take a good thing and make it suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job to the buzz for continuing the dp tradition of making web content uglier and more difficult to navigate. The old site was far easier to use, find posts and post comments. You guys sure know to take a good thing and make it suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
