<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revenge of ETS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/04/06/revenge-of-ets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/04/06/revenge-of-ets/</link>
	<description>The opinion blog of The Daily Pennsylvanian</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy McKay</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/04/06/revenge-of-ets/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/?p=200#comment-378</guid>
		<description>I think that Sharon brings up some very good points.  Taking tests on paper is a much more fair way to administer a test.  If different people see different questions, how is that fair at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Sharon brings up some very good points.  Taking tests on paper is a much more fair way to administer a test.  If different people see different questions, how is that fair at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Udasin</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/04/06/revenge-of-ets/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Udasin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/?p=200#comment-377</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree with Grad Student's comment. During my exam, we had a sample experimental section that was a sample of this new test. For some of the questions, you were allowed to select multiple answers, which would have made both scoring and success extremely difficult. Here's a good Web site that explains what some of these ridiculous changes would have been: http://www.petersons.com/common/article.asp?id=1943&#038;path=gr.pft.advice&#038;sponsor=1

That being said, however, the GRE should still be altered from its current form, as I advocate in my post. Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree with Grad Student&#8217;s comment. During my exam, we had a sample experimental section that was a sample of this new test. For some of the questions, you were allowed to select multiple answers, which would have made both scoring and success extremely difficult. Here&#8217;s a good Web site that explains what some of these ridiculous changes would have been: <a href="http://www.petersons.com/common/article.asp?id=1943&#038;path=gr.pft.advice&#038;sponsor=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.petersons.com/common/article.asp?id=1943&#038;path=gr.pft.advice&#038;sponsor=1</a></p>
<p>That being said, however, the GRE should still be altered from its current form, as I advocate in my post. Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grad Student (Who Took the GRE in 2005)</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/04/06/revenge-of-ets/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Grad Student (Who Took the GRE in 2005)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/?p=200#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Actually, people are lucky that the GRE isn't changing. In its current form, it is a rather easy test. The changes sounded like they would make the test more challenging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, people are lucky that the GRE isn&#8217;t changing. In its current form, it is a rather easy test. The changes sounded like they would make the test more challenging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
