<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Objects in mirror may be less clothed than they appear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/09/24/objects-in-mirror-may-be-less-clothed-than-they-appear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/09/24/objects-in-mirror-may-be-less-clothed-than-they-appear/</link>
	<description>The opinion blog of The Daily Pennsylvanian</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: N.</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/09/24/objects-in-mirror-may-be-less-clothed-than-they-appear/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/?p=86#comment-96</guid>
		<description>She forgot to mention the new, lockable single bathrooms in VP.  The new tiled color scheme is somewhat aesthetically pleasing, and the wide counter and full size mirror definitely have potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She forgot to mention the new, lockable single bathrooms in VP.  The new tiled color scheme is somewhat aesthetically pleasing, and the wide counter and full size mirror definitely have potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/09/24/objects-in-mirror-may-be-less-clothed-than-they-appear/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/?p=86#comment-95</guid>
		<description>this post was terrible.  why not just make a bulleted list of places to fuck at penn; spare us the torture of navigating the prose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this post was terrible.  why not just make a bulleted list of places to fuck at penn; spare us the torture of navigating the prose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/09/24/objects-in-mirror-may-be-less-clothed-than-they-appear/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/?p=86#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I miss the hyperlinks. They were funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss the hyperlinks. They were funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/09/24/objects-in-mirror-may-be-less-clothed-than-they-appear/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/?p=86#comment-93</guid>
		<description>To Objects only tip over if their center mass lies outside the area of their supports,

I think you're missing the point of the article. Whether or not the story about Joshua Frank is true doesn't really matter. It was nothing more than intro material leading up to her argument. And in the end, the article is about where not to have sex at Penn. I'm not sure why/how the validity of introduction material could get anyone so riled up. I am forced to think that you have a personal crusade against the author (perhaps she rejected you one night at a frat party?) because it seems like you didn't care what you were bitching about so long as you got a chance to bitch. Unless you have more interesting things to write about (concerning sex) - I know I don't - let her do the writing and if you're going to comment do it on something at least somewhat useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Objects only tip over if their center mass lies outside the area of their supports,</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re missing the point of the article. Whether or not the story about Joshua Frank is true doesn&#8217;t really matter. It was nothing more than intro material leading up to her argument. And in the end, the article is about where not to have sex at Penn. I&#8217;m not sure why/how the validity of introduction material could get anyone so riled up. I am forced to think that you have a personal crusade against the author (perhaps she rejected you one night at a frat party?) because it seems like you didn&#8217;t care what you were bitching about so long as you got a chance to bitch. Unless you have more interesting things to write about (concerning sex) - I know I don&#8217;t - let her do the writing and if you&#8217;re going to comment do it on something at least somewhat useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objects only tip over if their center of mass lies outside the area of their supports</title>
		<link>http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/2007/09/24/objects-in-mirror-may-be-less-clothed-than-they-appear/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Objects only tip over if their center of mass lies outside the area of their supports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamp.dailypennsylvanian.com/thespin/?p=86#comment-92</guid>
		<description>"Somewhere in Idaho, an SUV hit a telephone pole because two people couldn't wait to get home. Going at it in the back of the car threw it off balance."
You state it as if it were undeniable fact. Apparently you think that Joshua Frank is a carnie with a PhD in physics. I have to conclude that you are the dumbest person ever for having grounded Joshua Frank's  testimony in scientific truth. The original article was written as a piece of humour, a joke about midland hicks for us coastal elitists to giggle at...BUT YOU DIDNT GET IT! Instead of saying "haha, stupid hick carnie, what a poor excuse" and going onto the next article like everyone else did, you catapulted into a deep contemplative state and reveled in the madness that sex sometimes induces, a madness that anyone else readily identifies as physical impossibility. So, in writing this article, YOU became the butt of the joke, the laughing stock of any educated person who reads this blog. You have whittled yourself into a sad existence: the quintessence of idiocy who serves only as an outlet for others who need a boost of self-confidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Somewhere in Idaho, an SUV hit a telephone pole because two people couldn&#8217;t wait to get home. Going at it in the back of the car threw it off balance.&#8221;<br />
You state it as if it were undeniable fact. Apparently you think that Joshua Frank is a carnie with a PhD in physics. I have to conclude that you are the dumbest person ever for having grounded Joshua Frank&#8217;s  testimony in scientific truth. The original article was written as a piece of humour, a joke about midland hicks for us coastal elitists to giggle at&#8230;BUT YOU DIDNT GET IT! Instead of saying &#8220;haha, stupid hick carnie, what a poor excuse&#8221; and going onto the next article like everyone else did, you catapulted into a deep contemplative state and reveled in the madness that sex sometimes induces, a madness that anyone else readily identifies as physical impossibility. So, in writing this article, YOU became the butt of the joke, the laughing stock of any educated person who reads this blog. You have whittled yourself into a sad existence: the quintessence of idiocy who serves only as an outlet for others who need a boost of self-confidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
