Richard

Voters should consider that while Hillary tries to talk about the issues, Obama is promising change. Obama and Michelle have been married for 16 years. Obama has known Rev. Wright for 20 years. If Obama is really an agent of change, why hasn't he been able to change the negative attitudes about America of just two of the people closest to him – Michelle and Rev. Wright? I do not believe that Obama has never heard any of Rev. Wright's radical sermons. Many people have said they go to church and don't agree with everything their religious leader says. But those many people are not running for president and promising the American people that they will change the way our government operates and they will unite people of all races and religions. Obama has known for years that he was going to run for president. He has been very open about his using Rev. Wright as a mentor and an adviser. It's impossible that Rev. Wright never expressed his negativism toward America during their "mentoring" sessions. In 2006, just two years ago, Obama wrote "The Audacity of Hope", a title that he lifted from one of Rev. Wright's sermons. The fact that Obama was so close to Rev. Wright and then uninvited him to speak on the day he announced his run for the presidency is proof that he wasn't willing to take a chance on what Rev. Wright might say.

Sandra

The Clintons \\\' Multi-Million Dollar Dubai Conflict-of-Interest   According to the Wall Street Journal: “Former President Clinton stands to reap around $20 million -- and will sever a politically sensitive partnership tie to Dubai -- by ending his high-profile business relationship with the investment firm of billionaire friend Ron Burkle.  Moreover, this $20 million payoff does nothing to eliminate the conflict of interest. In fact, it makes it worse. Overall, Burkle has contributed large amounts of cash to the Clintons ’ campaigns, their legal defense fundThe question is, and has always been, what will Ron Burkle get in return for his generosity to the Clintons ?  Especially if Hillary wins the presidency. Now Obama, for his part, was slammed for ties to indicted political fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko, or as Hillary called him, “a slumlord.” (By the way, a photo surfaced recently that suggests Hillary may have her own Rezko scandal to worry about. Check it out here.) http://www.drudgereport.com/flash1.htm

sabrina

I don't even understand why women like Clinton, she is the biggest set back to feminism we've ever had. 1. cry's to win votes. 2. uses her husband career to claim experience. 3. allows her husband to cheat repeatedly. 4. she has won nothing on her own merits (if not for the Clinton name she wouldn't have been in the senate). 5. uses her husbands friends to get ahead. 6. Has her husband defend her instead of standing up for herself. Her attitudes don't make her a feminist, they just make her power hungry and egotistical.

Name: (required)
E-mail: (required, will not be published)

Type your comment below (html not allowed)